Discussion:
Aurora still going?
Will Dowling
2009-04-03 13:23:21 UTC
Permalink
Hi,
Just wondering if Aurora Linux is still in development? I have several
Blade 2500 workstations and a Sun Fire v880z server. I managed to
installed Ubuntu onto the workstations after problems with Gentoo and
Debian. Just found this distro and wondering how well developed it is?
If you guys need testers I could lend a hand with the blade 2500 and v880.

Cheers,
Will

--
Tom "spot" Callaway
2009-04-03 14:53:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Will Dowling
Hi,
Just wondering if Aurora Linux is still in development? I have several
Blade 2500 workstations and a Sun Fire v880z server. I managed to
installed Ubuntu onto the workstations after problems with Gentoo and
Debian. Just found this distro and wondering how well developed it is?
If you guys need testers I could lend a hand with the blade 2500 and v880.
We're in the process of migrating into Fedora SPARC. Slow, but steady
progress. We have a half-working Fedora 9 Beta ISO here:

http://secondary.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/releases/test/9-Beta/Fedora/sparc/iso/

Hardware detection is... poor at best. X almost certainly doesn't work
for most systems.

We're working on it though. :)

~spot
Vic
2009-04-03 15:31:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tom "spot" Callaway
Hardware detection is... poor at best.
lssbus in python (a requirement for anaconda, apparently) is close to
working - I've walked my SBus. But I'm not a python coder, so don't expect
it to be pretty...
Post by Tom "spot" Callaway
X almost certainly doesn't work for most systems.
Strangely, it worked first time on mine. I was delighted :-)

Vic.
Tom "spot" Callaway
2009-04-03 16:10:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Vic
Post by Tom "spot" Callaway
Hardware detection is... poor at best.
lssbus in python (a requirement for anaconda, apparently) is close to
working - I've walked my SBus. But I'm not a python coder, so don't expect
it to be pretty...
Well, if we combine your code with what we've got on our end, it might
actually be enough. Send it along!

~spot
Rafal Maszkowski
2009-04-03 15:45:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tom "spot" Callaway
Post by Will Dowling
Just wondering if Aurora Linux is still in development? I have several
Blade 2500 workstations and a Sun Fire v880z server. I managed to
installed Ubuntu onto the workstations after problems with Gentoo and
Debian. Just found this distro and wondering how well developed it is?
If you guys need testers I could lend a hand with the blade 2500 and v880.
We're in the process of migrating into Fedora SPARC. Slow, but steady
http://secondary.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/releases/test/9-Beta/Fedora/sparc/iso/
Hardware detection is... poor at best. X almost certainly doesn't work
for most systems.
We're working on it though. :)
Nice to hear you work on improving things. I am satisfied with the
current state - I upgrade my server E450 from fedora-secondary. I have
not tried to install recently (E4500 waits for its turn still with
Solaris) neither I use X-Window.

I wonder what do you plan to do after fixing installing and X:
- up to date updates for F9? (I have not checked recently if they differ
much from the mainstream - maybe not much)
- building complete F10?
- or maybe skipping F10 and doing F11?

R.
--
Jeżeli upadnie cywilizacja zachodnia, to będzie szansa na odbudowę cywilizacji
chrześcijańskiej. (dr Stanisław Krajski, Radio Maryja, 10 X 2001)
Tom "spot" Callaway
2009-04-03 16:17:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rafal Maszkowski
- up to date updates for F9? (I have not checked recently if they differ
much from the mainstream - maybe not much)
- building complete F10?
- or maybe skipping F10 and doing F11?
So, since we have Koji up and running for sparc, we've been able to
build a lot of packages for F10 and F11 already. I'm not yet sure if
I'll spend any time on installable F10 spins, because of the major
anaconda changes happening in the Fedora 11 release. The only reason
we're working on Fedora 9 is because I wanted to get something out
there, as Aurora is very dated at this point.

~spot
W***@nuim.ie
2009-04-03 21:25:49 UTC
Permalink
_______________________________________________
Aurora-sparc-user mailing list
Aurora-sparc-***@lists.auroralinux.org
http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user
Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html
Gatling, Paul
2009-04-03 21:31:30 UTC
Permalink
Good luck with that V880. Last I checked that processor wasn't supported in Linux. I got OpenBSD to install on it and I heard of Gentoo working, but not for me.

________________________________
From: aurora-sparc-user-***@lists.auroralinux.org [mailto:aurora-sparc-user-***@lists.auroralinux.org] On Behalf Of ***@nuim.ie
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 3:26 PM
To: Aurora user discussion
Subject: Re: [Aurora-sparc-user] Aurora still going?


Cheers for that. I'll download the fedora iso and install it one of our blades next week and let you guys know how I get on. I'm hoping to try to cluster the workstations and server for staff here to use. Nobody seems to want to use Solaris! In the blades I have XVR-100 and XVR-500 graphics card and in the v880 we have a XVR-1200. I'm not holding out that they'll work but I'll test them all anyway.

cheers,
will

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <***@redhat.com>
Date: Friday, April 3, 2009 4:16 pm
Subject: Re: [Aurora-sparc-user] Aurora still going?
Post by Will Dowling
Hi,
Just wondering if Aurora Linux is still in development? I have
several> Blade 2500 workstations and a Sun Fire v880z server. I
managed to
Post by Will Dowling
installed Ubuntu onto the workstations after problems with
Gentoo and
Post by Will Dowling
Debian. Just found this distro and wondering how well
developed it is?
Post by Will Dowling
If you guys need testers I could lend a hand with the blade
2500 and v880.
We're in the process of migrating into Fedora SPARC. Slow, but steady
http://secondary.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-
secondary/releases/test/9-Beta/Fedora/sparc/iso/
Hardware detection is... poor at best. X almost certainly
doesn't work
for most systems.
We're working on it though. :)
~spot
_______________________________________________
Aurora-sparc-user mailing list
http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user
Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html
Chuck Anderson
2009-05-17 00:33:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tom "spot" Callaway
We're in the process of migrating into Fedora SPARC. Slow, but steady
http://secondary.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/releases/test/9-Beta/Fedora/sparc/iso/
I just tried this on an Ultra 10. I had a weird issue with fsck on
bootup. It says /dev/sda is in use, then fails the fsck to the Repair
Filesystem prompt:

fsck.ext3: Device or resource busy while trying to open /dev/sda
Filesystem mounted or opened exclusively by another program?

I had to edit /etc/rc.sysinit to have it ignore this error just to be
able to boot up the first time...

/dev/sda isn't mentioned in /etc/fstab:

/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 / ext3 defaults 1 1
UUID=523e895a-22b7-4a7a-80dc-261faf0bd57a /boot ext3 defaults 1 2
tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
devpts /dev/pts devpts gid=5,mode=620 0 0
sysfs /sys sysfs defaults 0 0
proc /proc proc defaults 0 0
/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01 swap swap defaults 0 0

But I think the /boot entry is being recognized/mapped to /dev/sda
somehow. It doesn't mount on bootup, and trying to mount it manually:

[***@sun ~]# mount /boot
mount: /dev/sda already mounted or /boot busy

I think this is because Anaconda messed something up with the
partitioning. Is there supposed to be free space left at the
beginning of the disk for the Sun Diskabel?

[***@sun ~]# fdisk -l /dev/sda
Detected sun disklabel with wrong version [0x00000000].
Detected sun disklabel with wrong sanity [0x00000000].
Detected sun disklabel with wrong num_partitions [0].
Warning: Wrong values need to be fixed up and will be corrected by
w(rite)

Disk /dev/sda (Sun disk label): 255 heads, 63 sectors, 1108 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes

Device Flag Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 0 25 200812+ 1 Boot
/dev/sda2 25 1108 8699197+ 8e Linux LVM
/dev/sda3 0 1108 8900010 5 Whole disk

And Anaconda decided to make a PV out of the entire /dev/sdb device,
rather than creating a partition table there:

[***@sun ~]# fdisk -l /dev/sdb

Disk /dev/sdb: 13.6 GB, 13601193984 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1653 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000

Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table

[***@sun ~]# pvdisplay
--- Physical volume ---
PV Name /dev/sdb
VG Name VolGroup00
PV Size 12.66 GB / not usable 6.53 MB
Allocatable yes (but full)
PE Size (KByte) 32768
Total PE 405
Free PE 0
Allocated PE 405
PV UUID WjtLSC-SAfF-tJ68-3uSK-6Fel-ADak-rbuAuf

--- Physical volume ---
PV Name /dev/sda2
VG Name VolGroup00
PV Size 8.30 GB / not usable 15.31 MB
Allocatable yes
PE Size (KByte) 32768
Total PE 265
Free PE 2
Allocated PE 263
PV UUID yHmtJ9-2tnJ-2lqL-Smmv-nRSE-4o3m-xom0Zo


[***@sun ~]# vgdisplay
--- Volume group ---
VG Name VolGroup00
System ID
Format lvm2
Metadata Areas 2
Metadata Sequence No 3
VG Access read/write
VG Status resizable
MAX LV 0
Cur LV 2
Open LV 2
Max PV 0
Cur PV 2
Act PV 2
VG Size 20.94 GB
PE Size 32.00 MB
Total PE 670
Alloc PE / Size 668 / 20.88 GB
Free PE / Size 2 / 64.00 MB
VG UUID 0IAvNk-xkKV-Qx1s-HORT-81VY-QL80-sYoX8J


[***@sun ~]# lvdisplay
--- Logical volume ---
LV Name /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00
VG Name VolGroup00
LV UUID QSYPCt-sE8r-hAI4-KyV1-1YPg-jAaB-HaEYOP
LV Write Access read/write
LV Status available
# open 1
LV Size 20.38 GB
Current LE 652
Segments 2
Allocation inherit
Read ahead sectors auto
- currently set to 256
Block device 253:0

--- Logical volume ---
LV Name /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01
VG Name VolGroup00
LV UUID Ol3Xpn-son7-yjWa-eEJQ-dWDQ-3Seh-fyAU0p
LV Write Access read/write
LV Status available
# open 1
LV Size 512.00 MB
Current LE 16
Segments 1
Allocation inherit
Read ahead sectors auto
- currently set to 256
Block device 253:1

This was installed taking all defaults and "remove all partitions and
create a default layout", with zeroed-out blank disks beforehand.
Excerpt of anaconda-ks.cfg partitioning here:

# The following is the partition information you requested
# Note that any partitions you deleted are not expressed
# here so unless you clear all partitions first, this is
# not guaranteed to work
#clearpart --all --drives=sda,sdb
#part /boot --fstype ext3 --size=200 --ondisk=sda
#part pv.5 --size=0 --grow --ondisk=sdb
#part pv.4 --size=0 --grow --ondisk=sda
#volgroup VolGroup00 --pesize=32768 pv.5 pv.4
#logvol swap --fstype swap --name=LogVol01 --vgname=VolGroup00 --size=256 --grow --maxsize=512
#logvol / --fstype ext3 --name=LogVol00 --vgname=VolGroup00 --size=1024 --grow
Dennis Gilmore
2009-05-17 06:15:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chuck Anderson
Post by Tom "spot" Callaway
We're in the process of migrating into Fedora SPARC. Slow, but steady
http://secondary.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/releases/test/9-B
eta/Fedora/sparc/iso/
I just tried this on an Ultra 10. I had a weird issue with fsck on
bootup. It says /dev/sda is in use, then fails the fsck to the Repair
fsck.ext3: Device or resource busy while trying to open /dev/sda
Filesystem mounted or opened exclusively by another program?
I had to edit /etc/rc.sysinit to have it ignore this error just to be
able to boot up the first time...
/etc/blkid/blkid.tab is where is getting written wrong. all you need to edit
is /etc/blkid/blkid.tab or recreate it.

Dennis
mat
2009-07-24 21:37:41 UTC
Permalink
Is there any life left in Redhat's linux for sparc64 platform? The mirrors only have fc9 and rawhide
trees and there aren't even any netinst isos for rawhide... Is it possible to upgrade to rawhide via
yum from a fc9 base install?

It's sad to see that after all these years my trusty old sparc64s are probably going to have to
switch to debian or openbsd - there's always gentoo *shudder* or even solaris but let's face it,
solaris belongs on high end sparc and x86_64 these days. It's terrible on slower ultra-series
machines. For the moment I'm going to keep my dd'd corona install on /dev/sdb but it really needs
updating, preferably with something still aurora-flavoured.

Also, has everyone just migrated to IRC and/or is this list just dead?

Anyone?



mat
------------------
***@fsck.no-ip.org
www.fsck.no-ip.org
PGPKEY: 0x5F7549AE
Dennis Gilmore
2009-07-25 02:50:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by mat
Is there any life left in Redhat's linux for sparc64 platform? The mirrors
only have fc9 and rawhide trees and there aren't even any netinst isos for
rawhide... Is it possible to upgrade to rawhide via yum from a fc9 base
install?
you need to get the F-10 rpm from http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji
and a few deps it needs. then you can yum update to F-11 which is whats in
the rawhide tree. anaconda work is needed for it.

Dennis
Chris Andrew
2009-07-25 07:34:41 UTC
Permalink
Dennis,

This URL didn't work for me.

Can you point me to an alternative repo?

Thanks,

Chris.
Post by Dennis Gilmore
Post by mat
Is there any life left in Redhat's linux for sparc64 platform? The mirrors
only have fc9 and rawhide trees and there aren't even any netinst isos for
rawhide... Is it possible to upgrade to rawhide via yum from a fc9 base
install?
you need to get the F-10 rpm from http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji
and a few deps it needs.   then you can yum update to F-11  which is whats in
the rawhide tree.  anaconda work is needed for it.
Dennis
_______________________________________________
Aurora-sparc-user mailing list
http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user
Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html
--
Reasons why you may want to try GNU/Linux:

http://www.getgnulinux.org/
Gabriel VLASIU
2009-07-25 07:43:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chris Andrew
This URL didn't work for me.
Corect url is http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/
(do not forget the "/" at the end ot url).

Gabriel

- --

// Gabriel VLASIU
//
// OpenGPG-KeyID : 0xE684206E
// OpenGPG-Fingerprint: 0C3D 9F8B 725D E243 CB3C 8428 796A DB1F E684 206E
// OpenGPG-URL : http://www.vlasiu.net/public.key
Chris Andrew
2009-07-25 09:27:04 UTC
Permalink
Guys,

I want to do a new build, as opposed to an update. Can you recommend an ISO?

Cheers,

Chris.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Post by Chris Andrew
This URL didn't work for me.
Corect url is http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/
(do not forget the "/" at the end ot url).
Gabriel
- --
// Gabriel VLASIU
//
// OpenGPG-KeyID      : 0xE684206E
// OpenGPG-Fingerprint: 0C3D 9F8B 725D E243 CB3C 8428 796A DB1F E684 206E
// OpenGPG-URL        : http://www.vlasiu.net/public.key
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFKareReWrbH+aEIG4RAoXRAJ4hVp2CVQnAa2C+4bCP1mFUBA0ccACeMncH
nj+RsxnvEzUofhINRkRxk/A=
=LoH4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Aurora-sparc-user mailing list
http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user
Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html
--
Reasons why you may want to try GNU/Linux:

http://www.getgnulinux.org/
mat
2009-07-28 19:09:28 UTC
Permalink
Hmm, this has not been going nearly as well as expected... I've just trashed a couple of really
straight-forward installs on my test box (ultra60, netinst FC9 iso from mirrors, minimal install,
known good hardware) which just doesn't want to play for some reason: if I don't get a 404 error
from the mirror (I've settled on ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de as it seems complete, fast and reliable,
and that problem's now gone away) I get weird disk mount errors and lots of warnings from LVM. Which
is odd, as I manually partition and don't use LVM. I'd remove the damn thing if it wasn't a mkinitrd
dep.

So, currently I seem to be too thick to even install FC9 properly, even though I've done all this so
many times before - I don't have much time to look into this (servers on fire off the shoulder of
Orion and all that) and was planning on spending what time I do have on the more interesting part of
the process, the update to rawhide via Dennis' instructions. Anyone got a fool-proof "this is how I
set up my sparc64 FC9 box" cheatsheet floating around in $HOME by any chance?

I'll even volunteer to update/redo the FAQ with an Aurora-Use-Latest-Build section eventually, once
I've got a handle on the process (where is Matthew Swabey when you need him?) but I just don't have
the time atm to sort through basic fails at the first hurdle, unfortunately.

Oops, install 3 just bailed at the silo prompt. I really am getting something badly wrong here I
guess. Or am I?

Any enlightenment much appreciated.



mat
------------------
***@fsck.no-ip.org
www.fsck.no-ip.org
PGPKEY: 0x5F7549AE
Dr Matthew Swabey
2009-07-29 06:52:15 UTC
Permalink
Here I am!

I haven't been active in a long time with Aurora - mainly because I got
lumbered with E3500's which use Fibre Channel SBUS and legacy solaris
apps as the last remaining Solaris systems (although my 'new' solaris
box will be a SunFire v440) and I haven't fabbed the OpenSPARC chip that
my students have been augmenting with some Geometric Number Accelerators :)

I also got out of Aurora when the building I had my suns in burnt to the
ground....

Feel free to use any parts of the old FAQ I used to maintain for any reason.

Matthew Swabey
Post by mat
Hmm, this has not been going nearly as well as expected... I've just
trashed a couple of really straight-forward installs on my test box
(ultra60, netinst FC9 iso from mirrors, minimal install, known good
hardware) which just doesn't want to play for some reason: if I don't
get a 404 error from the mirror (I've settled on
ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de as it seems complete, fast and reliable, and
that problem's now gone away) I get weird disk mount errors and lots of
warnings from LVM. Which is odd, as I manually partition and don't use
LVM. I'd remove the damn thing if it wasn't a mkinitrd dep.
So, currently I seem to be too thick to even install FC9 properly, even
though I've done all this so many times before - I don't have much time
to look into this (servers on fire off the shoulder of Orion and all
that) and was planning on spending what time I do have on the more
interesting part of the process, the update to rawhide via Dennis'
instructions. Anyone got a fool-proof "this is how I set up my sparc64
FC9 box" cheatsheet floating around in $HOME by any chance?
I'll even volunteer to update/redo the FAQ with an
Aurora-Use-Latest-Build section eventually, once I've got a handle on
the process (where is Matthew Swabey when you need him?) but I just
don't have the time atm to sort through basic fails at the first hurdle,
unfortunately.
Oops, install 3 just bailed at the silo prompt. I really am getting
something badly wrong here I guess. Or am I?
Any enlightenment much appreciated.
mat
------------------
www.fsck.no-ip.org
PGPKEY: 0x5F7549AE
_______________________________________________
Aurora-sparc-user mailing list
http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user
Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html
- --
Dr Matthew Swabey
Rm3229, Bldg59 Zepler
School of ECS
University of Southampton
University Road
Southampton, SO17 1BJ
England

Tel: +44 (0)2380 597381
Fax: +44 (0)2380 597442
Vic
2009-07-29 08:11:05 UTC
Permalink
Small world, isn't it?
Post by Dr Matthew Swabey
I also got out of Aurora when the building I had my suns in burnt to the
ground....
I watched that happen. I lived less than a mile away at the time...

Vic.

William Richter
2009-07-25 09:46:23 UTC
Permalink
hey, Dennis. Any reason why I got this when I tried to click that link?

Reported Attack Site!
    
This web site at www.sparc.com has been reported as an attack site and has been blocked based on your security preferences.
Attack sites try to install programs that steal private information, use your computer to attack others, or damage your system.
Some attack sites intentionally distribute harmful software, but many are compromised without the knowledge or permission of their owners.

http://safebrowsing.clients.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?client=Firefox&hl=en-US&site=http://www.sparc.com/koji/

--

Thanks,

Bill

--- On Fri, 7/24/09, Dennis Gilmore <***@ausil.us> wrote:

From: Dennis Gilmore <***@ausil.us>
Subject: Re: [Aurora-sparc-user] Aurora/Fedora Sparc Linux Status
To: aurora-sparc-***@lists.auroralinux.org
Date: Friday, July 24, 2009, 7:50 PM
Post by mat
Is there any life left in Redhat's linux for sparc64 platform? The mirrors
only have fc9 and rawhide trees and there aren't even any netinst isos for
rawhide... Is it possible to upgrade to rawhide via yum from a fc9 base
install?
you need to get the F-10 rpm from http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji 
and a few deps it needs.   then you can yum update to F-11  which is whats in
the rawhide tree.  anaconda work is needed for it.

Dennis

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
Dennis Gilmore
2009-07-25 15:28:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by William Richter
hey, Dennis. Any reason why I got this when I tried to click that link?
Reported Attack Site!
This web site at www.sparc.com has been reported as an attack site and has
been blocked based on your security preferences. Attack sites try to
install programs that steal private information, use your computer to
attack others, or damage your system. Some attack sites intentionally
distribute harmful software, but many are compromised without the knowledge
or permission of their owners.
www.sparc.com is not the right website. i have no idea what is there or who
runs it

http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=27751 is the url to
the rpm build you will need to install. from memory the deps are satisfiable
from the F-9 repo.
Post by William Richter
http://safebrowsing.clients.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?client=Firef
ox&hl=en-US&site=http://www.sparc.com/koji/
--
Thanks,
Bill
Subject: Re: [Aurora-sparc-user] Aurora/Fedora Sparc Linux Status
Date: Friday, July 24, 2009, 7:50 PM
Post by mat
Is there any life left in Redhat's linux for sparc64 platform? The
mirrors only have fc9 and rawhide trees and there aren't even any netinst
isos for rawhide... Is it possible to upgrade to rawhide via yum from a
fc9 base install?
you need to get the F-10 rpm from http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji
and a few deps it needs. then you can yum update to F-11 which is whats
in the rawhide tree. anaconda work is needed for it.
Dennis
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
Aurora-sparc-user mailing list
http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user
Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html
William Richter
2009-07-25 17:31:13 UTC
Permalink
Looks like a Firefox issue, the first link takes my browser here: http://sparc/koji/

The second one takes me to the correct place, the only difference between the links' properties  is the build number info in the link.


--

Thanks,

Bill

--- On Sat, 7/25/09, Dennis Gilmore <***@ausil.us> wrote:

From: Dennis Gilmore <***@ausil.us>
Subject: Re: [Aurora-sparc-user] Aurora/Fedora Sparc Linux Status
To: aurora-sparc-***@lists.auroralinux.org
Date: Saturday, July 25, 2009, 8:28 AM
Post by William Richter
hey, Dennis. Any reason why I got this when I tried to click that link?
Reported Attack Site!
     
This web site at www.sparc.com has been reported as an attack site and has
been blocked based on your security preferences. Attack sites try to
install programs that steal private information, use your computer to
attack others, or damage your system. Some attack sites intentionally
distribute harmful software, but many are compromised without the knowledge
or permission of their owners.
www.sparc.com is not the right website.  i have no idea what is there or who
runs it

http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=27751 is the url to
the rpm build you will need to install.  from memory the deps are satisfiable
from the F-9 repo.
Post by William Richter
http://safebrowsing.clients.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?client=Firef
ox&hl=en-US&site=http://www.sparc.com/koji/
--
Thanks,
Bill
Subject: Re: [Aurora-sparc-user] Aurora/Fedora Sparc Linux Status
Date: Friday, July 24, 2009, 7:50 PM
Post by mat
Is there any life left in Redhat's linux for sparc64 platform? The
mirrors only have fc9 and rawhide trees and there aren't even any netinst
isos for rawhide... Is it possible to upgrade to rawhide via yum from a
fc9 base install?
you need to get the F-10 rpm from http://sparc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji
and a few deps it needs.   then you can yum update to F-11  which is whats
in the rawhide tree.  anaconda work is needed for it.
Dennis
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
Aurora-sparc-user mailing list
http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user
Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
Hector S. Mendoza O.
2009-07-26 14:47:46 UTC
Permalink
It's not a firefox issue, it's an apache config issue, either servername directive or rewrite directive is configured only with sparc as hostname and not FQN. Locally this would normally work since nsswitch will be configured for "files, dns" for resolve search, but on outside networks when redirecting to http://sparc/koji/ will send the browser to a search of sparc with all extensions (ie .com .net .org .gov) if it finds one it will stop there and will try to display the page. This is standard behaivoir on browsers

Héctor

Mensaje enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Nextel

-----Original Message-----
From: William Richter <***@pacbell.net>

Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 10:31:13
To: Aurora user discussion<aurora-sparc-***@lists.auroralinux.org>
Subject: Re: [Aurora-sparc-user] Aurora/Fedora Sparc Linux Status


_______________________________________________
Aurora-sparc-user mailing list
Aurora-sparc-***@lists.auroralinux.org
http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user
Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...